A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. OBJECTIVE To create and validate such a scale in a real population. MATERIALS AND METHOD We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. RESULTS We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. CONCLUSIONS We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice.
منابع مشابه
Follow-Up Visits in Doctor-Patient Communication: The Vietnamese Case
In a “follow-up visit”, a patient seeks medical attention for an existing health problem. Using data from the Vietnamese public hospital system, we present a more nuanced analysis of follow-ups in health communication than the one currently available. To be specific, we discriminate between “same follow-ups”, in which the doctor is the same one as in the last visit, and “different follow-ups”, ...
متن کاملA review of 17 years of application of partnership care model on the consequences of chronic diseases: Describing and assessing the quality of the methodology of papers
Background: Regarding the widespread prevalence of chronic diseases, nurses need to understand the choices, priorities, and abilities of patients in reality, their communication, and the social context in order to play their professional role and responsibility. This review study was conducted with two purposes: determining the effect of partnership-care-model (PCM) on the outcomes of chronic d...
متن کاملDevelopment and Validation of the Preliminary Version of Brief Inpatient Satisfaction Scale (BISS)
Background and Objectives: Questionnaire-based survey is the most common way of assessing patient satisfaction. However, most relevant survey instruments have been developed in western countries, and valid and reliable context-specific survey tools in this area are lacking. To help filling this gap, in this study we have developed and validated the preliminary version of the novel Brief Inpatie...
متن کاملFactors Involved in Missed Nursing Care: A Systematic Review
Background. Missed Nursing Care (MNC) is experienced in nearly all health care facilities. Awareness of the aspects involved in the occurrence of MNC can lead to the improvement of the quality of patient care. This systematic review aims to answer the question: "What factors are involved in the incidence of missed nursing care?" Methods. This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting...
متن کاملAssessing patient‐centred communication in teaching: a systematic review of instruments
CONTEXT Patient-centred communication is a key component of patient centredness in medical care. Therefore, adequate education in and assessment of patient-centred communication skills are necessary. In general, feedback on communication skills is most effective when it is provided directly and is systematic. This calls for adequate measurement instruments. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study wa...
متن کامل